A letter from Auschwitz

A little while ago I drove across Silesia to a small town near Krakow. In Polish it is called Oswiecim. In all the other languages of the world it is called Auschwitz.

About one and a half million people were murdered there. Most of them were Jews. I do not need to say much about what is there now. Auschwitz needs no adjectives, and if it did need them it would not have them from me.

The guidebook takes you to a bolt of cloth woven from human hair; a mountain of shoes; ten thousand toothbrushes and mugs and saucepans; suitcases with names and addresses from all over Europe painted on them; a ramp by a railway line; some ruined ovens; a pond, black with ashes; a breezeblock wall between some huts with some candles burning at it; some showers in a concrete block which were never connected to the water.

There was a pile of children's clothes. There was a room full of women's hair, and amongst the hair was a single plait.
There were some people crying quietly at these things, and there were some people who were not. Snow fell on it all. The houses for miles around seemed guilty. The girl serving in the shop whistled along to rock music on the radio, and painted her nails. They say that the birds do not sing at Auschwitz, and they are right. But the poplars at nearby Birkenau grew strong and tall, and that seemed strange. A pall hung over it, and I did not want to breathe.

I do not know what all this means. I came here wise and I went away a fool. It is not that there are not lessons to be learned: it is that they seem too trite or too small, or simply that looking into the vast maw of Auschwitz freezes the capacity to draft nice propositions, or that the imperative of considering millions of individual sets of facts leaves no time or energy for generalities.

Where did all these people go? I don't know. I am a Christian, and I don't know. But not just into the air, or into a pond, I'm sure. And not just into the memories of people who knew them and the nightmares of people who didn't. And they weren't just transmuted into principles, to be the tools of politicians and philosophers. They were too big for that.

Auschwitz killed optimistic humanism. It was much more revealing that Auschwitz ever existed than that Auschwitz ceased to exist. But that does not mean what it is sometimes said to mean. The German philosopher Theodor Adomo wrote: 'No more poetry after Auschwitz'. He was wrong. We must make sure that he was wrong. 

Auschwitz means that symphony orchestras must be protected with all the might in the world. Auschwitz means that nationalism must always be watched, and always subordinated to the demands of the smallest individual within any national boundary.

Of course there are many other reasons why Auschwitz matters (some of them very big, and some of them sounding like platitudes) - reasons to do with living intensely, and looking hard at flowers, and saying sorry, and the importance of eating crusts, and other things that should only be said in tears to an intimate.

On my way out I bought a book of poems from the smiling girl in the shop. It was called The Auschwitz Poems and ran to 415 pages. I read them all. They all said one thing: that they did not understand. That is something worth stating.
I wrote my MA thesis on museum interpretation of the Holocaust, based on my experience of visitng Auschwitz and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC. It's the hardest piece of research and writing I've ever had to do, but at the same time the most rewarding.

The worst part for me was the well-worn step down to the small gas chamber at Auschwitz - as well-worn as a step in a Norman castle, but eroded over a matter of months than centuries. It was tough.

I appreciate you writing this blog. Thanks.
yeah this sucks really.